haha no problem mate. I slightly disagree here though in that,it is good defensive work. Barca kept on missing no matter what they did. Their problem? they couldn't shoot from far away and mostly almost tried to walk the ball into the goal. Bayern knocked and knocked only to be answered once because of a foolish defensive mishap by ashley cole to leave his man wide open to guard Gomez. Someone forgot about their priorities. Gomez had a turn shot but reached for it, fell backwards and skied it why? because a defender closing him down put him off. If you look at inter's defense, it was probably one of the most settled defenses in footy back then. The only reason Chelsea didn't really attack, as i believe, was because of a selection mistake by Di Matteo. He opted for Kalou where you had Malouda available. He can dribble the ball and his strong enough to fight off Schweini and Tymo. Kalou on the other hand can't dribble and isn't that tactically aware. Drogba is a type of striker who you play one twos with and just needs someone like Malouda and you saw most of his through balls were in vain as Mata was bullied off the ball by the Bayern defense and Kalou went to sleep once he passed the ball. Put Drogba and Lukaku, two physical players and surely, Chelsea would've had their chances as well offensively.

TL;DR? is it bad offense if the keeper saved most of the shots?