fuckcancer

- friends
1,907 link karma
12,095 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Two-Year Club

    Verified Email

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

Feeling a bit down, talk of suicide? BENNED! by throwawayDOXin antisrs

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

ARE YOU IN ANY WAY SHOCKED BY THIS???

Only 30% Of American Want Tougher Drug Laws by cfigginsin Marijuana

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

If this is your website can you please move that god damned share bar thing. I'm probably not your standard viewer, but that little twitter bar covers up the entirety of the left half of the text on your web page for me and makes your articles impossible for me to read.

We need to see more of these all over the U.S. by Mind_Virusin Marijuana

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

I'll play a round. No, because they're legally regulated and taxed and such.

If you were put in charge of trimming Earth's human population down to 3 billion or so, what would your criteria be for who stays and who goes? by Clayburnin AskReddit

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

Easy and humane. Each person is allowed 1 kid and then sterelized. Bonus insentive money for being strelized before having a kid. We'd have the population down by half in 1 generation.

This pisses me off. by mikeyperrinoin trees

[–]fuckcancer 1 point2 points ago

But he's completely right though. Marijuana isn't safe because it's natural. There's a billion things that are natural that aren't safe. Marijuana just happens to be pretty safe and also natural. Natural in no way implies safety. There's a million more things that we could point out that aren't safe that are naturally occuring, let's point to tobacco since it's pretty close to marijuana but still dangerous.

Does that mean what he says means that marijuana should be illegal? Fuck no! It means that we should quit using the god damned naturalistic fallacy. I've been advocating for us to stop using the naturalistic fallacy every time that I see it come up. Saying that marijuana is safe because it's natural is a nonsequiter. Poison Ivy, Poison Sumac, Cyanide, Lead, Poison Dart Frog Poison, Death Cap Mushrooms, all natural. The list goes on and on.

If you don't want to see such easy attacks against us, quit using such blatantly falacious arguments.

Well, this patch destroyed Nunu (Nunu's Ultimate huge nerf) by Kimi7in leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 2 points3 points ago

I actually noticed this at least since the Varrus patch. I felt sorry for the nunu on the other team and informed him about being able to see him. Nunu was more useful when he thought he was invisible to us, so I may have inadvertantly won us the game by telling him.

Should gankplanks ultimate be reliable? by Fnifin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 11 points12 points ago

Karthus says: I don't think that's the reason.

Support Amendment 64! Let Colorado be the first plcae to regulate Marijuana like Alcohol! by nospimi99in trees

[–]fuckcancer 1 point2 points ago

You know what else is breaking federal law? 14 states with medical marijuana. You know what we have access to? 14 states with medical marijuana.

My friends said I couldn't live in a storage unit... by k_moin funny

[–]fuckcancer 1 point2 points ago

Okay, okay, okay... The storage room sex thing is weird, but honestly you'd be a lot safer being locked up in a rapist's public storage dungeon since people tend to frequent the area and walk right by you than you would in a rapists respectable country home dungeon that there's no chance of people walking by.

I think the more likely explanation, to me, would be that Storage Room Sex Guy wants to keep his sexcapades secret from a significant other.

Baking soda, cancer and fungus - the cancer industry is waking up to the power of sodium bicarbonate by axolotl_peyotlin conspiracy

[–]fuckcancer 2 points3 points ago

I'm not saying that it's a cure by any means, but there's more methods of action than "Unmutating DNA" that any given cancer drug can take. It could cause reduced growth of tumors, activate cell death, boost the immune system in some way that targets cancer cells specifically, etc. etc. When you say some absurd method of action such as "Unmutating DNA" of course it's going to sound like bullshit.

But reading the article, it seems that they're claiming that it's just used to kill of cancer causing fungi before too much damage is done.

Found in a high school classroom: by revile221in atheism

[–]fuckcancer -1 points0 points ago

Barely. If your only standard for it to be atheism related is that it doesn't mention god, then this subreddit will become simply a general discussion forum.

Found in a high school classroom: by revile221in atheism

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

You don't have to change "The United States of America" to "Earth" to make it secular though. There's pretty much only two words in the pledge that makes non-secular, and if you took those out both "pledges" would be just as secular as one another.

Found in a high school classroom: by revile221in atheism

[–]fuckcancer 22 points23 points ago

How is this even remotely atheist? Respect for the earth is not a solely atheist ideal. Native Americans, Pegans, Wiccans, etc all have respect for the planet as central themes.

Bring on the downvotes, but this is just simply not atheist material at all nor do you have to be an atheist to accept it.

If anything at the very closest it's anti-nationalism which only has a few glaring simularities as cult/religion/group think, but I don't think blind patriatism is completely overlooked by this poster by making earth allegience it's top priority either. At best, as far as anti-nationalism goes, it's simply expanded nationalism and still suffering from some of the same flaws of group think as nationalism on a larger scale.

But I digress bring on the downvotes that always accompany pointing out that something that r/atheism claims is not exclusively an atheist ideology. Fuck 1 love. Us vs them, right-o?

Why not rotate Summoner's Rift 45 degrees clockwise? by WDoEin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 3 points4 points ago

That only seems to apply if you make a new map constrained by the limitted and square nature of the WC3 custom map engine. If it's the same map only the camera rotated, you could keep all the dimensions and angles the exact same. Riot isn't limited by Blizzard's custom map choices like DoTA was.

What ever happened to the twisted treeline? You know that 3v3 map you forgot about. by Siethronin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 1 point2 points ago

What I think would revive TT is a jungle redesign and a total item revamp in the same vein as Dominion VS Summoner's Rift. If TT had its items changed so that the entire meta wasn't just Tanky DPS to win, it'd be way more fun of a mode. IMO they need to make it viable to have 3 different roles, some type of damage dealer, a damage soak and maybe an assassin/jungler thing going.

TT as it stands is just so stale from the lack of love, but if it got a spit-shine it could be beautiful.

Who should be making the calls? by zeomatrixin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer -3 points-2 points ago

The nigga that takes the reins makes the calls. No one makes calls at my elo so it's usually me. I can usually win team fights when I'm dead just by marking the people who are out of position.

Why not rotate Summoner's Rift 45 degrees clockwise? by WDoEin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 4 points5 points ago

Explain. You take the same map, and rotate the camera 45 degrees. How has the distance changed? Keep in mind. Same map. The only thing that has changed is the camera.

Inspections found a faulty check valve on engine #5. We are replacing tonight. Next attempt Tuesday, 5/22 at 3:44 AM ET. by yoda17in space

[–]fuckcancer 1 point2 points ago

The ISS position in orbit is coming up with these launch times. I'm sure they'd love to launch at noon on a monday, but there won't be anything to launch to then.

This might be funny if I didn't know this bitch in real life. by rawrgsin AdviceAnimals

[–]fuckcancer -3 points-2 points ago

Damn, if I wasn't on a PS3 I'd try to find it and post the link, but I believe there was actually a study done that showed that "Pot Babies" were more sociable and scored higher on tests. Honestly, I'd be more worried about a mother taking something that could actually cause death like aspirin.

The first screenshot of Survivor Zero? by sedfordin survivorzero

[–]fuckcancer 9 points10 points ago

Fuck yeah. I'm popping mad boners right now.

The first screenshot of Survivor Zero? by sedfordin survivorzero

[–]fuckcancer 4 points5 points ago

Is there currently no plan for urban and suburban sprawl? Maybe urban areas that have a higer rate of infected but a better chance of finding overlooked supplies or even someone's stash who met an unfortunate end?

League is down? by HippoopooLoLin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer -1 points0 points ago

I guess this is code to take the time to try and learn HoN's ridiculous shop. I'm going to get yelled at so bad. Wish me luck.

Nocturn Gameplay with Commentary by gameopzin leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

Nocturn Gameplay with Inane Unrelated Commentary That has Nothing to Do WIth Nocturn Gameplay

FTFY

LoLMatches Client Lets You See Your Normal ELO, but is it a keylogger?? by peutetrein leagueoflegends

[–]fuckcancer 0 points1 point ago

Cool. 35 elo since last time this site was posted.

Fucking finally by Fantasysagein nyc

[–]fuckcancer 4 points5 points ago

I'm using your style of argument. If glancing at women is sexing them into sluthood, you are a pedophile since you've seen children. You can't hold one position and not the other. You are a filthy pedophile if everyone who looks at an eyecatchingly dressed woman has raped them into a slut.

But I digress, I don't believe that looking at someone makes them into a slut. As a matter of fact, my real beliefs when you don't put words into my mouth is that calling a woman a slut is stupid. There's no reason that a woman can't enjoy sex as long as she's safe and honest, as a man should be, you leg beard who gets mad at generalizations while making them when they suit you.

This doesn't free a woman, or man, from responsibility if she dresses for attention and gets it. It could be a clownsuit. A lot of summer, and even winter, clothing is designed to get attention. A woman doesn't have to wear it. Glancing at women in attention gathering attire is not sex nor rape nor does it make them a slut, as you claim.

view more: next